Things you never knew about Keynes

In my time, I’ve read a lot about Keynes and a lot by him too. It started with the [amazon_link id=”B0000CHV15″ target=”_blank” ]Roy Harrod biography[/amazon_link], then the [amazon_link id=”0333903129″ target=”_blank” ]Robert Skidelsky trilogy[/amazon_link] (since updated as a single volume version), and more recently the excellent [amazon_link id=”0674057759″ target=”_blank” ]Capitalist Revolutionary[/amazon_link] by Roger Backhouse and Bradley Bateman. I’ve read at various times [amazon_link id=”9650060251″ target=”_blank” ]The General Theory[/amazon_link], [amazon_link id=”1441492267″ target=”_blank” ]Essays in Persuasion[/amazon_link], [amazon_link id=”1447418220″ target=”_blank” ]The Economic Consequences of the Peace[/amazon_link], [amazon_link id=”0230249582″ target=”_blank” ]Essays in Biography[/amazon_link], and parts of [amazon_link id=”1614270112″ target=”_blank” ]A Treatise on Money[/amazon_link].

[amazon_image id=”0674057759″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]Capitalist Revolutionary: John Maynard Keynes[/amazon_image]

So it’s a pleasant surprise to learn new things about him, and so I am from Benn Steil’s The Battle of Bretton Woods. The story of Keynes sitting in bed in his dressing gown of a morning, dealing with his investments is well known. My admiration has grown on learning now that he also liked to sleep late in the mornings and go to bed early; he referred to this as ‘snuffing the candle at both ends’. How much more refreshing than the cult of only sleeping for a few hours a night. He enjoyed his first job, in the India Office, mainly because of the 11am to 5pm hours and two months of annual holiday.

Steil also cites this comment by Keynes on financiers: “How long will it be found necessary to pay City men so entirely out of proportion to what other servants of society commonly receive for performing social services not less useful or difficult?”

Amen to that.

 

Where’s leadership when you need it?

I’ve started to read properly Benn Steil’s [amazon_link id=”0691149097″ target=”_blank” ]The Battle of Bretton Woods[/amazon_link], which has been sitting tantalisingly on the book pile for a few weeks, and I’d only paged through when laid low by a cold. I like this quote from President Roosevelt, early in the book – it’s his message to the opening of the Bretton Woods conference:

“Economic diseases are highly communicable. It follows, therefore, that the economic health of every country is a proper matter of concern to all its neighbours, near and distant. Only through a dynamic and soundly expanding world economy can the living standards of individual nations be advanced to levels which will permit a full realization of our hopes for the future.”

How apt for our own times, as well as 1944. I spent a couple of days this week at the OECD’s annual forum and was mulling over the OECD’s origins in US Marshall Aid and post-war rebuilding. Just over 50 years old, it is a low-key place but is an important part of the framework of international economic governance, dealing with gritty but important stuff like tax co-ordination and financial compliance. There has also been a lot of wider thought there about what kind of global economy we might be able to build for the future, including engagement with the wider public, with its Better Life work, for example.

However, technocrats can only go so far without political impetus. The major surplus countries of our day, Germany and China, unfortunately show no signs of the vision that might encourage them to acts of global leadership.

[amazon_image id=”0691149097″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Battle of Bretton Woods: John Maynard Keynes, Harry Dexter White, and the Making of a New World Order (Council on Foreign Relations Books (Princeton University Press))[/amazon_image]

Money, money, money

The Liberty Reserve story is fascinating. E-money guru Dave Birch (at 45:00) has been doing wonders explaining it. There’s been so much written about Bitcoin that I’ve only just realised that Liberty Reserve and several other competitor electronic money sites existed. It might be difficult for the authorities to distinguish between criminal and socially-useful innovation in e-money, although presumably the ability to verify identity is going to be key. Even so, electronic local currencies will no doubt arouse the interest of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs in case of tax minimisation activity. There’s surprisingly little sign of policy interest in electronic currencies, however. The only recent paper I’ve spotted is the ECB’s Virtual Currency Schemes (pdf) of October last year.

My top books about money that get to the philosophical issues are David Wolman’s [amazon_link id=”0306818833″ target=”_blank” ]The End of Money[/amazon_link], Keith Hart’s [amazon_link id=”1861972083″ target=”_blank” ]The Memory Bank[/amazon_link], Edward Castranova’s [amazon_link id=”0226096262″ target=”_blank” ]Synthetic Worlds[/amazon_link] and [amazon_link id=”0226893952″ target=”_blank” ]Boggs[/amazon_link] by Lawrence Weschler. The latter three are some years old now. I’m delighted to say, though, that Dave Birch is even now – quill pen in hand – writing on the subject of money and identity.

[amazon_image id=”0306818833″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]End of Money[/amazon_image]

[amazon_image id=”0226893952″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]Boggs: A Comedy of Values (Passions and Wonders Series)[/amazon_image]

Reforming economics

An update on the process of reforming the undergraduate economics curriculum.

The story so far is that in February 2012 a conference on the subject of whether the curriculum at this level is appropriate in the light of the financial crisis, and of employers’ skill needs, was hosted by the Bank of England and Government Economic Service. The pre-and post-conference papers are collected in [amazon_link id=”1907994041″ target=”_blank” ]What’s The Use of Economics: Teaching the Dismal Science After the Crisis.[/amazon_link]

[amazon_image id=”1907994041″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]What’s the Use of Economics?: Teaching the Dismal Science After the Crisis[/amazon_image]

A working group of academics and employers picked up the reins in a working group which drew up the statement published in the latest Royal Economic Society newsletter. There was real consensus about this, and some of the working group’s members are taking forward the conclusions in a discussion about subject benchmarks with the Quality Assurance Agency, which reviews the performance of higher education institutions.

In parallel, Wendy Carlin of UCL is starting work on developing a new curriculum and supporting teaching materials, to be freely available. The first stage of her work is being supported by INET. Her aim is to have a curriculum to pilot from the autumn of 2014.

This is progress beyond our wildest dreams when I first started to contact people about the conference 18 months ago. I think the profession is really quite divided: there are many economists who don’t believe there’s all that much that needs to change. But it’s obvious that enough do now feel the need for intellectual reform that a real shift is under way.

The paradox of trust

I’m off early this morning to the OECD Forum – on Jobs, Equality, Trust – in Paris, taking part in two sessions. The organisers picked up on the themes of my book [amazon_link id=”0691156298″ target=”_blank” ]The Economics of Enough[/amazon_link], especially the section on trust. I wrote a new essay on trust for the OECD Yearbook, focusing on the paradox that the complex, globalized economy is more dependent on trust than ever, but measures of trust in institutions of various kinds indicate that it’s rather fragile.

[amazon_image id=”0691145180″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Economics of Enough: How to Run the Economy as If the Future Matters[/amazon_image]

It’s going to be interesting to see what the mood of the Forum is, as it gathers policymakers, business people, unions and NGOs, as well as academics – in other words, more workmanlike and less insulated from the world by affluence than Davos. I’ll be tweeting, under the hashtag  #OECDwk as no doubt will other participants @SpeakerLab @slaughteram @tsipirikos @acraiginparis @diane1859 @LaurenceEvans @JArleRH and @yanisvaroufakis