What to read next?

Here are the recent arrivals:

[amazon_link id=”1451686455″ target=”_blank” ]The Forgotten Depression – 1921: The Crash That Cured Itself[/amazon_link] by James Grant

[amazon_link id=”1137383585″ target=”_blank” ]Economics for the Curious: Inside the Minds of 12 Nobel Laureates[/amazon_link] by Robert Solow

[amazon_link id=”B00GGSG3VU” target=”_blank” ]The Citizen’s Share: Reducing Inequality in the 21st Century[/amazon_link] by Joseph Blasi, Richard Freeman and Douglas Kruse

 

New arrivals

James Grant’s looks most enticing….

If you only read two economics books….

On Tuesday Radio 4 will be broadcasting a programme, Teaching Economics After the Crash. (It goes out Tuesday December 2 just after 8pm, and I presume a podcast afterwards.) I took part, and the presenter, Aditya Chakrabortty of The Guardian asked all the participants to nominate two must-read economics books for the programme website. The whole set of selections adds up to an interesting reading list.

Mine were John McMillan’s [amazon_link id=”0393323714″ target=”_blank” ]Reinventing the Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets[/amazon_link], and Thomas Schelling’s [amazon_link id=”0393329461″ target=”_blank” ]Micromotives and Macrobehavior[/amazon_link].

[amazon_image id=”0393323714″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]Reinventing the Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets[/amazon_image]   [amazon_image id=”0393329461″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]Micromotives and Macrobehavior[/amazon_image]

The cast list makes the programme’s conclusions pretty clear: it won’t give a positive verdict about modern economics! Wendy Carlin, Danny Quah and I seem on the face of it to be the hardline mainstream voices, which is bizarre. You could only think that of us if you had only spoken to heterodox economists about the state of play. I’m sure it will be an interesting and thought-provoking programme – after all, The Guardian has been campaigning on this issue – but it certainly isn’t going to be a descriptive portrait of the complete state of opinion in economics.

The Coaseian Milkman

It is one of life’s joys when a new book turns up unexpectedly in the post, and last week Edge publishing kindly sent me one that on the face of it was a bit of a random choice. It’s [amazon_link id=”1770530606″ target=”_blank” ]The Milkman[/amazon_link] by Michael Martineck. Mysterious because it’s a science fiction novel set in a future dystopian America – specifically the Buffalo, New York area. Still, I’ve been travelling a lot and was glad of some light relief, and The Milkman turned out to be a page-turning read.

[amazon_image id=”1770530606″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Milkman: A Free World Novel[/amazon_image]

Besides, the publisher’s decision to send me the book became less mysterious as the pages turned. Not only does it feature an economist as one of the good guys (yessss!) but it has a highly topical set of economic issues at its core. The book asks what happens when the marketisation of public goods, and the globalisation of the world economy, is taken to its extreme? This dystopian world is run by three global mega-corps which have eliminated governments as highly inefficient. There is no guilt or innocence: simply a question of whether each person’s (sorry, asset’s) net present value to the corporation that owns him/her is positive or not. What is their future contribution to profit, how much will they cost to keep healthy, when will their value as a deterrent to other awkward customers exceed their value in their workplace? This is also a constantly online world – people are tied, and tracked, by smart watches. Public space, and public goods, have vanished. All the externalities have been internalised under the corporate umbrella.

So I won’t pretend it’s the most literary novel I’ve ever read, but I really enjoyed it. What’s not to love about a storyline that takes Ronald Coase seriously?

Truth emergencies

I very much enjoyed Rebecca Solnit’s book of essays, [amazon_link id=”1595341986″ target=”_blank” ]The Encyclopedia of Trouble and Spaciousness[/amazon_link].

[amazon_image id=”1595341986″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Encyclopedia of Trouble and Spaciousness[/amazon_image]

Among the many interesting perspectives is her take on the aftermath of disasters, and critique of some standard stories of post-disaster disorder – reports or looting and violence. Solnit’s argument is that ‘looting’ is often – usually? – a grotesque misinterpretation of people trying to cope with chaos – with no electricity, no functioning payments system, no logistics – and taking reasonable steps to get food and water. As for violence, she argues that most people become unusually solicitous of the needs of others in the wake of a natural disaster, and that violence often is perpetrated by authorities fearful of losing control – “elite panic”. She describes the way this happened in Haiti, and in New Orleans post-Katrina, when the authorities and white vigilantes shot at black men on the streets, many of whom turned out to be trying to do what the authorities should have been doing, helping the stranded and vulnerable. Anybody who read Dave Egger’s book [amazon_link id=”0141046813″ target=”_blank” ]Zeitoun[/amazon_link] will find that strikes a chord. Without doubt crimes are committed, she accepts, but “far more people did heroic things.”

[amazon_image id=”8804600128″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]Zeitoun[/amazon_image]

She concludes: “A disaster unfolds a little like a revolution. No one is in charge and anything is possible. The efforts of elites, often portrayed as rescue or protection, are often geared more towards preserving the status quo.” Emergencies are always truth emergencies. This struck a real chord with me because of a report I co-authored with Patrick Meier some years ago for the UN Foundation and Vodafone Foundation about the role of information in disasters – more vital than you can imagine unless you have been caught up in one. (Just think about how helpless or angry or frustrated you feel when your train halts for 5 minutes and there is no announcement – and then magnify that feeling in intensity a thousand-fold.)

The book also has two terrific essays on what Silicon Valley money and incomers are doing to San Francisco (not good) – fabulous observation of the ‘Google bus’ invasion. She writes also about climate change and ecology, the far North, growing food, Detroit, and much else. It has been an ideal companion for me for a couple of hectic weeks. Solnit will be in Bristol for the Festival of Ideas Cities Festival next November.

Post-Festival reading

This year’s Festival of Economics in Bristol ended yesterday and was another great success. The thing that most delights me, as the programmer, is the engagement of the (large) audiences with the issues debated by the panels. The aim of the Festival is to ensure there is a forum for debate between economists – and other social scientists and practitioners – and members of the public. We are in extraordinary times and it is essential to have a public space for discussion. In our small way, and with huge thanks to the organisers of the Festival of Ideas and all the sponsors, we achieved that again.

A while before the Festival I blogged about the books by contributors. This is an update about the books they variously mentioned in their talks.

Bridget Rosewell cited Kurt Vonnegut’s [amazon_link id=”0385333781″ target=”_blank” ]Player Piano[/amazon_link] on the fear of technological unemployment. Gavin Kelly referred to [amazon_link id=”0521379172″ target=”_blank” ]John Stuart Mill[/amazon_link]’s assessment of the Industrial Revolution (it had had no impact, he said in 1870 – the point being that in the previous 70 years real wages had risen by just 0.4% a year, whereas they trebled between 1870 and 1950). I referred to Brynjolfsson and McAfee’s [amazon_link id=”0393239357″ target=”_blank” ]The Second Machine Age[/amazon_link]. Adair Turner quoted statistics from Thomas Piketty’s [amazon_link id=”067443000X” target=”_blank” ]Capital in the 21st Century[/amazon_link]. Nigel Dodd referred to Keith Hart’s [amazon_link id=”1861972083″ target=”_blank” ]The Memory Bank[/amazon_link]. An audience member quoted Francis Fukuyama,[amazon_link id=”1846682576″ target=”_blank” ]The Origins of Political Order[/amazon_link].

[amazon_image id=”0385333781″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]Player Piano[/amazon_image]

There are lots of tweets under #economicsfest, and when the videos are online I’ll add the link here. Next year’s Festival of Economics will take place from 12-14 November. Ideas for subjects are welcome!