The Great Rebalancing – whether we like it or not

This is a book that should be read by: (a) politicians, central bankers and anybody else involved in macroeconomic policy; (b) all economists; (c) all students of economics; and (d) everybody else.

[amazon_link id=”0691158681″ target=”_blank” ]The Great Rebalancing: Trade, Conflict and the Perilous Road Ahead for the World Economy [/amazon_link]by Michael Pettis is as sharp and clear as a cut diamond in its analysis of the continuing global imbalances. The author brings logic, accounting identities and clarity of thought and language to bear on the issue of prospects for the global economy, putting most other commentators into the shade.

He also provides a small but fundamental shift in perspective: the questions of balance of payments and capital flows are approached in terms of global general equilibrium – in other words, everything is connected. Thus Greece’s problems are not only caused by Greek tax avoidance or low productivity, but by German domestic policy choices too. Pettis writes: “I extend our basic knowledge of open economies and apply it to the global economy as a single closed system in order to show the many surprising ways policies and conditions are related.” Every country affects all others through the capital and current accounts. And the balance of payments balance – a large current account surplus requires large capital exports to a large current account deficit (group of) countries. A large gap between domestic savings and investment, or correspondingly between GDP growth and consumption growth, will result in a current account gap.

The book looks at two broad sets of imbalances, US-China and Germany-Eurozone periphery. “Very large persistent surpluses and deficits are almost always the result of distorted policies in one or more countries.” The distortions he identifies are the investment-driven focus of Chinese policy, at the expense of domestic consumers, brought about by ultra-low interest rates on savings in domestic banks (there being no alternative investment opportunities for most Chinese people). In Germany, rather than this Chinese-style direct financial repression, the distortion has been ever since reunification in 1990 constraining wages and consumption growth in order to favour employment and exports, with production growing faster than consumption.

Pettis is keen to point out that to analyse the Euro crisis in terms of thrifty and productive Germans versus idle, spendthrift Spaniards or Greeks is nonsense. The references to culture and morals in trying to explain what has happened in the global economy are misplaced. Given a persisting German savings surplus, perforce exported, the Euro periphery countries have only four options: 1. use German capital exports to fund investment, paid for by debt; 2. let consumer borrowing rise to spend more; 3. devalue or impose trade restrictions – both ruled out by Euro and EU membership; 4. engineer a recession to cut domestic production. When the debt levels required by opting for (1) and (2) got too high, only (4) remained available, as (3) has seemed unthinkable. But the book goes on to argue that unless the Germans will accept that the burden of adjustment must fall on their domestic policy, default and the break-up of the Euro are inevitable. “It is impossible to expect Spain to repay its debt to Germany unless Germany runs a trade deficit and Spain a trade surplus.” The echoes of the 1930s (when France played the role of Germany today, complacent about its economic strength until the strains reached breaking point) are horribly clear.

Pettis is a little more optimistic about the prospect of a policy adjustment in China. A renminbi revaluation would help ordinary households at the expense of the central bank and the very wealthy. Slower GDP growth and lower exports would actually enable faster consumption growth, and would make for greater social stability. Combined with a slow but effective rebalancing of US policy, this part of the global imbalance could be worked out in a reasonably orderly way.

However, the book ends with some gloomy predictions. Pettis concludes that there has been hardly any adjustment, post-crisis, in the global economy. Unless Germany and China, as well as the US and Euro periphery, adjust their policies, then:

– German growth will slow sharply and its banks will suffer large losses

– much of peripheral Europe will both default and abandon the Euro

– China could adjust still but is running out of time, and unless it writes down bad bank debts and transfers some state and corporate wealth to households it will end up with a ‘lost decade’

– the world economy will be weak for many years

– trade tensions will increase

– but, one way or another, the world economy will rebalance.

“Major imbalances are unsustainable and will always eventually reverse, but there are worse ways and better ways they can do so…..Any policy that does not clearly result in a reversal of the deep debt, trade and capital imbalances of the past decade is a policy that cannot be sustained.”  Unfortunately, he ends, that isn’t what’s happening.

There is one idea buried away here that seems to me to hold out a spark of hope. Given that the persistent surplus countries seem determined not to reverse their anti-consumptionist policies, and to continue running current account surpluses, it is inevitable that something will erode the value of the Euro periphery assets held by German banks – default, devaluation, inflation in the periphery. Alternatively, Germany could grant assets to the struggling countries – something akin to the Marshall Plan, Pettis suggests. Given the deeply-held worldview Germans clearly hold about the superiority of their approach to the economy, maybe the idea of a Marshall Plan to save the Euro is the one idea that could catch on there?

It will be obvious that I think this is an excellent book, albeit very gloomy indeed. Its logic seems irrefutable: the unsustainable is not sustained. The only question is how the global rebalancing will come about, and it doesn’t look a pretty prospect.

I’d not come across Michael Pettis before, but looking him up now find that his previous book, [amazon_link id=”0195143302″ target=”_blank” ]The Volatility Machine[/amazon_link], analysing emerging market financial crises, also attracted rave reviews. He was previously at Bear Stearns and Columbia University and is now a professor at Peking University – he blogs on China’s economy. His work obviously deserves to be widely read and above all, please, in policy circles.

[amazon_image id=”0691158681″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Great Rebalancing: Trade, Conflict, and the Perilous Road Ahead for the World Economy[/amazon_image]

The corner office, with equations

The Org by Ray Fisman and Tim Sullivan, which I reviewed here yesterday (The tough life of the corner office), is aimed at the general reader – and after all, almost all of us do experience working life in an organisation. A parallel book for the expert reader is the new [amazon_link id=”0691132798″ target=”_blank” ]Handbook of Organizational Economics[/amazon_link], edited by Robert Gibbons and John Roberts. This is a technical volume, and normally wouldn’t feature in this blog. But I make an exception because of the calibre of the contributors and range of the book.

The book starts with the theoretical basics. In Chapter 1 Erik Bryjolfsson and Paul Milgrom write about ‘complementarity’ in organisations, the scope for the whole to add up to more than the sum of the parts in this specific kind of collective action context. Robert Gibbons and John Roberts cover incentives in organisations, and there are chapters on property rights and on transaction cost economics (with Oliver Williamson one of the authors). There is a section on different methodologies. Subsequent sections look ‘within’ firms, at individual behaviour and decisions, and at processes and structures (ranging from corporate governance to strategy to innovation); ‘between’ firms, looking at vertical integration, market structure, contracting; and ‘beyond’ firms, looking at corruption, and at delegation in public bureaucracies. Among the roll call of contributors are Josh Lerner, Timothy Bresnahan, Abhijit Banerjee, Luis Garicano, Ed Lazear and many others.

This is not a book anyone would sit down to read cover to cover (all 1232 pages); but pretty much every chapter will be an indispensable starting point for its subject. This handbook is the definition of magisterial.

[amazon_image id=”0691132798″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Handbook of Organizational Economics[/amazon_image]

The tough life of the corner office

[amazon_link id=”0446571598″ target=”_blank” ]The Org[/amazon_link] by Ray Fisman and Tim Sullivan has a subtitle that many people might consider to be a contradiction in terms: The Underlying Logic of The Office. A majority of us work in offices, and we know it isn’t logic so much as emotion or perhaps just habit that drives things. Often, indeed, the emotions of the kindergarten playground.

Nevertheless, Fisman and Sullivan have achieved that rare feat of writing a book about management and organisation that offers genuine new insights, and is a good read as well. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

The key moment of illumination comes early in the book when they write: “Jobs that stay inside the org are the hard ones: hard to measure, hard to define and hard to do. If they were easy, we’d hire contractors to do them for us, and the market, with prices working their magic, would work just fine at getting the job done.” The way to understand orgs – and why so many are so badly run – is that the work people do in them is characterised by information asymmetries and transactions costs.

The book applies the principles of information economics to many examples of organisations ranging from the US Army and the Baltimore Police Department to Apple and Citigroup. It also covers issues such as organisational culture, rocketing executive pay, merger mania, innovation (they recommend the ‘skunkworks’ approach) and the like, bringing in other areas of economics as needed – game theory, economics of ‘superstars’, behavioural psychology.

For example, take the pay spiral. The chapter begins by recounting John Thain’s extravagance – $1,400 for a waste paper basket in an office remodelling that cost $1.2 million. It moves onto Henry Mintzberg and others documenting that what CEO’s do is get interrupted by people who want to talk to them, in between all the meetings. They have little time alone and certainly don’t spend time poring over data and documents to make a rational calculation about the best thing for the business to do. Decisions are based on the CEO’s judgements about information conveyed verbally by a selection of other people. The skill of the CEO is gathering and weighing soft information.

Relatively few do this well. After all, running an org is really difficult, as already described. So slightly greater skill in doing so is amplified into significantly greater pay: a good CEO decision will be really valuable financially to a big company. Just like Hollywood stars, a slight edge makes an individual executive a hot property in the CEO jobs market. The market rewards them correspondingly. Remuneration committees embed this upward spiral because they have interlocking memberships – not necessarily the same individuals, but connected in a social network. Besides, the Remcos believe that their guy is better than average – the Lake Woebegone effect – so deserves better than average CEO pay. And the spiral continues.  So this chapter uses various parts of the economics toolkit to explain the excessive pay phenomenon. CEOs are doing difficult work, are valuable to their orgs – and they’re still overpaid.

For, contrary to popular belief, management is in general a good thing. The authors cite evidence that better managers deliver better outcomes in the public sector, where administrators and managers tend to be reviled  – in terms of exam results in schools or survival rates in hospitals. One of the most striking bits of evidence is the massive increase in productivity in an Indian textiles firm given $250,000 of free consultancy advice by Accenture (49 firms turned down the offer, showing what they thought of management consultants). The key to the improvement was installing systems for tracking inventory and monitoring performance – reducing, in other words, the information asymmetries that had held back the business.

The book is packed with great examples. Fisman is Professor of Social Enterprise at Columbia Business School, and was the co-author of another terrific book, [amazon_link id=”0691144699″ target=”_blank” ]Economic Gangsters[/amazon_link] (with Ted Miguel). Sullivan is editorial director of Harvard Business School Press.

Their bottom line is that managing an organisation is intrinsically difficult. “If there’s one message to take away from this book, it’s that a glass half full may be the best you can hope for.” That is so much more plausible a conclusion than conventional management books that advocate one gimmick or another.

Even with this note of realism, though, the principles and examples set out in The Org will help anybody who manages anything think through the specifics of their own organisation, and maybe improve its management a little. And even small improvements are well worth having.

[amazon_image id=”0446571598″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Org: The Underlying Logic of the Office[/amazon_image]

What to read in 2013, part 1

A quick browse through some of the publishers’ catalogues reveals plenty of enticing new books due out this winter and spring. I’ll start with a selection from some of the university presses.

From my own publisher Princeton University Press, a lot of economics and finance titles coming out. One I’ve read in proof and will be reviewing is [amazon_link id=”0691158681″ target=”_blank” ]The Great Rebalancing: Trade, Conflict, and the Perilous Road Ahead for the World Economy[/amazon_link] by Michael Pettis, an outstanding book. Others that look enticing are [amazon_link id=”0691057761″ target=”_blank” ]Tesla: Inventor of the Electrical Age [/amazon_link]by W. Bernard Carlson; [amazon_link id=”0691155674″ target=”_blank” ]Worldly Philosopher: The Odyssey of Albert O. Hirschman[/amazon_link] by Jeremy Adelman; and [amazon_link id=”0691149097″ target=”_blank” ]The Battle of Bretton Woods: John Maynard Keynes, Harry Dexter White, and the Making of a New World Order[/amazon_link] by Benn Steil.

[amazon_image id=”0691158681″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Great Rebalancing: Trade, Conflict, and the Perilous Road Ahead for the World Economy[/amazon_image]

Yale University Press will be bringing out Stephen King’s [amazon_link id=”0300190522″ target=”_blank” ]When The Money Runs Out: The End of Western Affluence[/amazon_link]; and at the same time (May) Timothy Beardson’s [amazon_link id=”0300165420″ target=”_blank” ]Stumbling Giant: The Threats to China’s Future[/amazon_link]. Sounds like they need to be read as a pair. I also like the look of Emma Griffin’s [amazon_link id=”0300151802″ target=”_blank” ]Liberty’s Dawn: A People’s History of the Industrial Revolution.[/amazon_link]

[amazon_image id=”0300190522″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]When the Money Runs Out: The End of Western Affluence[/amazon_image]

Oxford University Press has forthcoming books looking at a couple of very important issues, global governance and corporate governance. [amazon_link id=”0199693900″ target=”_blank” ]There’s Divided Nations: Why global governance is failing, and what we can do about it[/amazon_link] by Ian Goldin; and [amazon_link id=”0199669937″ target=”_blank” ]Firm Commitment Why the corporation is failing us and how to restore trust in it[/amazon_link] by Colin Mayer.

[amazon_image id=”0199693900″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]Divided Nations: Why global governance is failing, and what we can do about it[/amazon_image]

At Cambridge University Press, the range of titles includes quite a few that intrigue me: [amazon_link id=”1107609623″ target=”_blank” ]Outsourcing Economics: Global Value Chains in Capitalist Development[/amazon_link] by William Milberg and Deborah Winkler; [amazon_link id=”1107678943″ target=”_blank” ]An Economic Theory of Greed, Love, Groups and Networks [/amazon_link]by Paul Frijters and Gigi Foster; and [amazon_link id=”B00ADP734S” target=”_blank” ]Wall Street Values: Business Ethics and the Global Financial Crisis[/amazon_link] by Michael A. Santoro and Ronald J. Strauss are among them.

[amazon_image id=”1107678943″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]An Economic Theory of Greed, Love, Groups, and Networks[/amazon_image]

In the spring, the University of Chicago Press is bringing out a new book by the excellent science writer Philip Ball, [amazon_link id=”1847921728″ target=”_blank” ]Curiosity: How Science Became Interested in Everything[/amazon_link]. I’m very interested in [amazon_link id=”0226256618″ target=”_blank” ]Political Arithmetic: Simon Kuznets and the Empirical Tradition in Economics[/amazon_link] by Robert Fogel; and somewhat interested in both [amazon_link id=”022603772X” target=”_blank” ]The Rise of the Public Authority: Statebuilding and Economic Development in Twentieth-Century America[/amazon_link] by Gail Radford; and [amazon_link id=”0226066959″ target=”_blank” ]The Great Inflation: The Rebirth of Modern Central Banking[/amazon_link] by Michael D. Bordo.

[amazon_image id=”0226256618″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]Political Arithmetic: Simon Kuznets and the Empirical Tradition in Economics (National Bureau of Economic Research Series on Long-Term Factors in Economic Development)[/amazon_image]

Out any time now from MIT Press is [amazon_link id=”026201842X” target=”_blank” ]Banking the World: Empirical Foundations of Financial Inclusion[/amazon_link], edited by Robert Cull, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt and Jonathan Morduch. Given the interest economists have in robots at present, maybe we should all read [amazon_link id=”0262018624″ target=”_blank” ]Robot Futures[/amazon_link] by roboticist Illah Reza Nourbakhsh. I like the look of [amazon_link id=”0262018713″ target=”_blank” ]America’s Assembly Line[/amazon_link] by David E Nye and James Heckman’s [amazon_link id=”0262019132″ target=”_blank” ]Giving Kids a Fair Chance (A Strategy that Works)[/amazon_link] – Heckman being one of the first economists to identify the importance of early years upbringing and education for both private and social outcomes.
[amazon_image id=”0262018713″ link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]America’s Assembly Line[/amazon_image]
Of course, this isn’t an exhaustive list of either academic publishers or their titles, and other suggestions will be welcome. I’ll report on what’s in the catalogues of some of the general publishers another time.

Making our own progress

This is my least favourite day of the year, so I’ve been gazing moodily out at the rain while reading this and that online. Courtesy of Andrew Kelly of the Bristol Festival of Ideas, I came across this extraordinary essay, Dark Ecology, by Paul Kingsnorth. I can’t do justice to its existential gloom – it needs to be read to get the full, intense flavour of its despair and anger. It took me on to the Dark Mountain Manifesto, launched by Kingsnorth in 2009. Point 1 of the manifesto is:

“We live in a time of social, economic and ecological unravelling. All around us are signs that our whole way of living is already passing into history. We will face this reality honestly and learn how to live with it.”

Empires and societies clearly do collapse. Ecological disasters occur. There is a large literature on it – recent references would include Joseph Tainter’s [amazon_link id=”052138673X” target=”_blank” ]The Collapse of Complex Societies[/amazon_link] and Jared Diamond’s [amazon_link id=”0241958687″ target=”_blank” ]Collapse[/amazon_link].

[amazon_image id=”052138673X” link=”true” target=”_blank” size=”medium” ]The Collapse of Complex Societies (New Studies in Archaeology)[/amazon_image]

And yet, New Year’s grouch though I am, the Dark Mountain call to withdraw from modern, technological society does not convince me at all. It conflates environmental questions, which any sensible person will be concerned about, with a range of different economic and social questions. It therefore rejects any application of the conventional framework of policy thought to the environmental problems – whereas I believe pricing carbon properly would be the biggest single step possible towards environmental sustainability, meaning anybody who cares about this should be focused on the political economy of raising the price of carbon-use.

This isn’t to say there won’t be some dark times ahead. The global economy isn’t remotely out of the financial/economic crisis, and political leaders haven’t begun to respond adequately to tackle huge challenges ranging from the fiscal via the demographic to the ecological. But progress, including technological progress, is both possible and continuing; while many of the problems identified by Kingsnorth are in principle soluble. To take one (minor) example, his “human scale” shops are feasible – it is weak competition policy and dismal planning policies that have turned the UK into a monoculture of giant stores.

Indeed, I hope Dark Mountainism doesn’t spread too far, interesting as the manifesto is. As Paul Krugman set out in a brilliant but relatively unknown QJE paper (pdf), History versus Expectations, in 1990, the rate at which the economy grows depends fundamentally on positive expectations for the future outweighing the habits of the past: people need to have a sense of progress for it to occur. Much better to engage with the world and change it, than to withdraw from it.

A happy, peaceful and prosperous 2013 to all readers of this blog –  and here’s to making it happen.