Businesses and economists

I’ve been reading an interesting little book, Price Setting by Truman Bewley. He did something that’s still quite unusual for economists (despite the excellent work by Stefanie Stantcheva): asking people what they think. In this case, it was asking hundreds of American businesses over a period of years how they set prices.

Most of the book consists of direct quotations from interviewees across a range of industries: manufactures, restaurants, construction, feed grains etc. Two types of price setting emerged. Sellers of highly differentiated products seldom cut prices, on the basis that demand is relatively inelastic, and it upset their customers too much to raise prices so better not to get into the position of needing to do so. Sellers of commoditised products vary prices substantially, but are increasingly turning to ‘formula based pricing’ such as indexation to a specific spot price or a price series published by trade organisations.

Nobody ever referred to monetary policy and the Fed. Nor did they talk about their decisions in terms of cost based pricing and stable marginal variable costs. Bewley states: “Marginal variable costs of manufacturing firms tend to remain constant or to decline as a function of output until capacity is reached, at which point marginal variable costs rise abruptly.” He calls this counterintuitive, although it doesn’t seem so to me, when you think about vintages of capital and capacity utilisation patterns.

In fact there’s a rather endearing tone in the book of a Martian explorer trying to explain humans to his fellow Martians in their own Martian language; businesses just don’t think in standard economic concepts so what they say needs translating. Similarly with productivity and no doubt other concepts too.

Although another way of thinking about it is that the margins economists assume are the important choice variables are not; other margins (quality, technology…) may be more important. When I was on the UK Competition Commission and we asked about price setting, the answer was almost always ‘what the market will bear’ and other variables preoccupied the management – although clearly this was a sample who found themselves in a competition inquiry.

Screenshot 2025-06-10 at 08.56.27Anyway, kudos to Truman Bewley for embarking on this interplanetary exploration. It’s the kind of book economists (including macro types) should read before they pick up their modelling pencils.

 

What I’ve been reading

A bit of a catch-up.

Last weekend we went to the Hay Festival and heard Rebecca Solnit in conversation with James Rebanks. So I read her latest book of essays, No Straight Road Takes You There. I think it’s one of her best essay collections – suprisingly comforting. The intro title sort of sums it up: “In praise of the indirect, the unpredictable, the immeasurable, the slow and the subtle.” When asked about how to respond to These Times, her answer was: do what you can, save what you can. Nothing is inevitable but there isn’t an easy direct route to better outcomes than look likely at the moment.

91C1ylL8kuL._AC_UY327_QL65_

We also heard at Hay Javier Cercas talking to Kirsty Young about his Terra Alta detective series. The first one, Even The Darkest Night, was fantastic, I’ve been saving the second, Prey for the Shadow, and the third (of a trilogy), Fortress of Evil, is just out. Highly recommended – and Cercas was very funny and charistmatic.

I just finished Daniel Dennett’s memoir, I’ve Been Thinking. I loved this, very readable and lots of inside-the-academic world gossip and insight. One of the highlights of my life to date was when – on one of only two times I’ve endured Davos – he came to hear me talk about GDP.

71xybOwl8oL._AC_UY327_QL65_

I also enjoyed Doyne Farmer’s Making Sense of Chaos: A Better Economics for a Better World, now in paperback. As anybody who knows his work would expect, it focuses on complexity and agent-based modelling for the better economics. It’s a very clear explanation of their merits, and the demerits of standard macroeconomic forecasting. I’m not a complete convert but perhaps I should be: two brilliant young researchers he refers to a lot in the book are former Bennett Institute postdoc Penny Mealy and our current research affiliate Maria Del Rio Chanona. If they think this is the way to go, I don’t want to disagree with them.

71LhDIx4HcL._AC_UY327_QL65_

Also, some novels:

The Cafe with No Name by Robert Seethaler, a decent enough read but disappointing after I’d seen so many glowing reviews

Measuring The World by Daniel Kehlmann, tremendous, an absolute page-turner, which is surprising when you realise it’s about two 18th century German scientists